The Danger of Being a Charismatic Leader

Mike Holmes | November 23, 2009 | Comments Comments

Charismatic leader

I used to work under a charismatic leader. He was smart, handsome, always smiled, a “visionary”, and knew ways to connect with people. He spearheaded new initiatives, new programs, and new projects (which he was head of).  The problem is when he left all the initiatives, programs, projects, AND people were gone as well–everything he created vanished! It was like he was never there.

Granted, he had leadership problems to contend with–the person over him wasn’t  focused on growth. And since an organization will only go as far as its leader will take it, he couldn’t go as far as he wanted to. After a while he got tired of banging his head against a “bronze” ceiling and left.

The problem with most charismatic leaders  is that WHATEVER they create leaves with them. According to Jim Collins they are “time-tellers”:

“Having a great idea or being a charismatic visionary leader is ‘time telling’; building a company [or ministry] that can prosper far beyond the presence of any single leader and through multiple product life cycles is ‘clock building.’” [1]

This is in stark contrast to being a leader of purpose. Charismatic leaders tell the time; leaders of purpose build clocks.

Good Leadership Works Itself Out of a Job

Nothing’s wrong with charisma. But “larger than life” leaders are over-emphasized. A true leader is someone who can build or rebuild something that can outlast them. The differences between a  charismatic leader and a leader of purpose are as follows:

CL: Are the “heart” of an organization.

LOP: Build the heart for an organization.

CL: Recruit followers.

LOP: Recruit and raise up leaders.

CL: Secure power for themselves.

LOP: Give power away to other competent leaders.

CL: When they leave, move, or die the organization falters.

LOP: When they leave move or die the organization prospers.

Look at Saul and David. David spent the remainder of his life preparing his successor, while Saul didn’t. So when David died Israel prospered without him. Unlike Saul, when he died his dynasty lagged “and the house of Saul grew weaker and weaker.” [2]

Your job as a leader is to build something that lives beyond you. All the success in the world means nothing if it crumbles after you leave!!

What do you think??

  1. James Colling and Jerry Porras. Built to Last: Success Habits of Visionary Companies.  page 23.
  2. 2 Samuel 3:1 (New King James Version)
  • Share/Bookmark
Filed Under: Leadership, Ministry
  • Mak
    I think this is a very timely discussion. A leader of purpose earns the respect of others because he builds them up and show them their potential and the ability to be self sufficiently. People are drawn to that leader. A charismatic leader can wow the people with theatrics but the people around are not challenged to improve themselves because nothing of substance is drawn out of them, pushing their own self sufficiency. A charismatic leader almost forces people to be completely dependent on him, while a Leader of purpose allows people to stand on their own. A charismatic leader is selfish - It's all about him/her; A leader of purpose is selfless and has faith - He/she believes in the seeds being planted in the people and is willing the let them flourish..... Give me a leader of purpose any time!
  • Exactly!!!!

    CL's force people to live off them while LOP's force people to be self suffficient. And I'll take a leader of purpose myself;)
  • Bob
    Another Great Post Mike!

    I believe those we classify as charismatic are really just individuals that are great with people and passionate about their subject but simply undeveloped in their leadership skills. Find a truly Charismatic Leader and you will have found the best of both worlds.
  • Bob,

    You make great points about what we define as "charismatic leaders." I'm glad you enjoyed the post:)
  • Anna
    Love this post!
  • Thanks!! I'm glad...be blessed!
blog comments powered by Disqus